This was written by JB Williams at the North American Law Center.
Is America going to make the same mistake they made when they voted for Obama by voting for Ted Cruz. I Pray Not!
Ted Cruz is in the US Senate Illegally?
© JB Williams
US Senator Ted Cruz from Texas, has been under fire in his bid for the White House due to his Canadian citizenship records which make it quite clear that he does not meet the Constitutional “natural born Citizen” requirement for the Oval Office, despite the opinion letter from his Harvard friends.
Following a total lack of vetting on Barack Hussein Obama in 2008 and 2012, many insist that no one ever enter the Oval Office again without proper vetting, including proof of meeting all Constitutional requirements for office. Obama’s massive destruction of our Constitutional Republic has placed the issue of Constitutional eligibility on the front burner for many Americans, and partisanship has nothing to do with it.
In the effort to vet every 2016 presidential candidate, Cruz, who had once stated that both he and Barack Obama were ineligible for the Oval Office, found himself under tight scrutiny from the same people who tried to stop Obama from taking the Oval Office via fraud. Ted placed himself in the crosshairs of constitutionalists who do not care about partisan politics, by seeking an office he is not eligible to seek.
In investigating Cruz eligibility for the Oval Office, his eligibility for the US Senate came into question…
The Constitutional requirements for the US Senate are as follows;
“No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.”
At 42 years old in 2012, Ted Cruz obviously met the age requirement of 30 years. However, he also needed to meet the requirement of at least “nine Years a Citizen of the United States.” As the Constitution states, one cannot be just an “Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.”
The known source for the Founders use of the term natural born Citizen, The Law of Nations, also defines “Inhabitant” as follows;
“The inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are foreigners, who are permitted to settle and stay in the country. Bound to the society by their residence, they are subject to the laws of the state while they reside in it; and they are obliged to defend it, because it grants them protection, though they do not participate in all the rights of citizens. They enjoy only the advantages which the law or custom gives them. The perpetual inhabitans are those who have received the right of perpetual residence. These are a kind of citizens of an inferior order, and are united to the society without participating in all its advantages. Their children follow the condition of their fathers; and, as the state has given to these the right of perpetual residence, their right passes to the posterity.”
Today, the legal term for this condition in the United States is “illegal alien,” someone in our country and living under U.S. jurisdiction, without legally belonging to society. Modern social justice attitudes often refer to these people as “undocumented citizens” which of course are not citizens at all. Our I.R.S. created a new class of “citizen” for the purpose of collecting taxes from illegal aliens, “resident aliens” which is an inhabitant (not citizen) who pays taxes.
Contrary to current leftist social justice ideologies that view all “illegal aliens” in the U.S. as only “unauthorized” or “undocumented” citizens, our laws identify them as nothing more than “illegal aliens,” or “resident aliens” who pay taxes under I.R.S. codes.
Further, in any matter of law, authenticated evidence supersedes any ad all politically motivated opinions, especially opinions which are either unfounded or poorly founded. Unlike Barack Hussein Obama who posted three forged U.S. Certifications of Live Birth and later a Hawaiian newspaper announcement of his birth to evidence his Oval Office eligibility, Ted Cruz issued his Canadian Birth Certificate as evedence of being “born a citizen of Canada”
His Canadian document is proof of Canadian Citizenship at birth for Senator Ted Cruz. The next document, “Certificate of Renunciation of Canadian Citizenship” proves that he remained a a legal citizen of Canada until renouncing that citizenship in May of 2014m which means, he was still a legal citizen of Canada in 2012 when he ran for, was elected and took the oath of office for the US Senate. That official document proves that Ted Cruz was born Canadian in 1970 and remained a legal citizen of Canada until renouncing his Canadian citizenship in May of 2014. Those official documents also prove that Ted Cruz was a legal citizen of Canada in 2012, when he sought and claimed a seat in the U S Senated as a legal U.S. Citizen.
As a result of the damning evidence,d the dCruz campaign hired friends at Harvard to issue a letter which makes a egal case for how Ted Cruz (and Barack Obama) might be a natural born Citizen of the USA eligible to seek the Oval Office. However, a legal opinion letter is not equal to, nor does it supersede authentic evidence to the contrary.
It is possible for a child to be born outside of the United States, and still acquire legal U.S. citizenship at birth through a parent, according to U.S. Naturalization Codes pertaining to “Citizenship at Birth for Children Born Outside the U.S. and it Territories.” If th related conditions are met, a child Born outside of the United States to on U.S. Citizen parent, in this case, Ted’s mother, the parents can file for and receive U.S. Citizenship for the child by filing a CRBA form with a U.S. Consulate at the time of birth. The statutes governing this naturalization process state;
“A child born abroad to a U.S. citizen parent or parents may acquire U.S. Citizenship at birth if certain statutory requirements are met. The child’s parents should contact the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate to apply for a Consular Report of Birth Abroad of a Citizen of the United States of America (CRBA) to document that the child is a U.S. citizen. If the U.S. enbassy or consulate determines that the child acquired U.S. citizenship at birth, a consular officer will approve the CRBA application and the Department of State will issue a CRBA, also called a Form FS-240, in the child’s name.”
According to related U.S.laws governing “Citizenship at Birth for Children Born Outside the U.S. and its Territories,” the following conditions had to be met in order for Ted Cruz to legally claim U.S. citizenship at birth via these naturalization statutes, through his mother.
The U.S.citizen parent had been physically present in the U.S. or its territories for a period of at least five years at some time in his or her life, prior to the birth, of which at least two years were after his or her 14th birthday.
If the U.S. citizen parent spent time abroad in any of the following three capacities, this can also be counted towards the physical presence requirement:
? Serving honorable in the U.S. armed forces;
? Employed with the U.S. Government; or
? Employed with certain international organizations.
Additionally, time spent abroad by the U.S. citizen parent while the U.S. citizen parent was the unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person who meets any of the three conditions listed above can also be counted.
Ted’s parents were at no time serving in the U.S. armed Forces, employed by the U. S. Government or by any of the certain international organizations, during their eight years in Canada, between 1966 and 1974. Further, Ted’s father Rafael, was at no time a legal citizen of the United States prior to naturalizing in 2005, from Canada. Rafael’s known legal citizenship status as of 1970 was Cuban, not American.
Unfortunately, there is no evidence to suggest that the parent of Ted Cruz ever filed a CRBA form with the U.S. Government in or around 1970, which is why Ted Cruz released a copy of his Canadian citizenship records and no any U.S. citizenship records. At present, all FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests filed in search of any U.S. citizenship documents to confirm the true official U.S. citizenship status of Ted Cruz have been denied access. All citizenship records for Ted Crus are sealed unless and until Ted Cruz agrees to allow any such records to be released by either U.S. or Canadian agencies.
As a result, there remains no authentic evidence to support the claims that Ted Cruz is either a “natural born” or “naturalized” citizen of the United States.
Without any form of U.S. Citizenship documentiation, and proof of Canadian citizenship at birth in 1970 and holding that legal status until May 2014 when he renounced his birth citizenship to Canada, there is no way for Ted Cruz to prove that he is either “natural born” and eligible for the Oval Office, or “natrualized” prior to 2012, whenhe sought and accepted a seat in the U.S. Senate as a legal citizen of Canada.
On the basis of all available evidence today, Ted Cruz is in fact holding a seat in the U.S. Senate illegally, with no documented proof of legal U.S. citizenship whatsoever, and proof of Canadian citizenship between the years of birth in 1970 and May 2014.
It is unfortunate that a person so many have placed their political faith in has proven willing to defraud his supporters for both votes and millions in campaign donations. But it is better we know now, than after he wins the GOP nomination only to be destroyed by Democrats later, using the same facts and evidence presented here.
What will the people do with this knowledge? Are they really motivated by restoration of the Constitutional compliance, or mere political expediency?
Of all the Politicians in DC, I thought CRUZ was on our side…But once again Politics have failed us. In Cruz’s lust for the Presidency he and his campaign have decided that we are but rats in a lab and he has gone high tech in his quest for voters. And it started in IOWA.
Cruz has your number. Your telephone number that is. And he scours your phone for additional contacts to increase his rat population. But it goes MUCH deeper than that…
His team of psychologists, using psychographic targeting, have built a personality test that categorize voters who then receive specially tailored messages. So when you hear from Cruz or one of his campaigners, your getting a message that YOU want to hear, not a message that is heartfelt by Cruz. He knows if you are pro-gun, anti-refugee, traditional and so forth. For instance, if his test determines that you are a traditionalist you might receive a message that promotes hunting as a family activity and his message may have an image of a father taking his son duck hunting. It doesn’t get any more FAKE than that.
But it does get worse. Cruz hired Cambridge Analytica partially owned by a hedge fund executive Robert Mercer who just so happens to have contributed $11 MILLION to one of Cruz’s SUPERR PACS. So that’s one of the people he will beholding to do favors for if he wins.
All of this tells us what type of President that Cruz would be. Do you really want our government to be more intrusive than it already is? Do we want someone running our government who looks at its people as if they were just lab rats? And we thought Obama was scary.
All of this and more can be found in a Washington Post article in its political section at Washington Post
Thank you Mr. Greenwood
Thanks to “Strengthen the USA”